1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 325 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Cedric | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
