1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (181 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW X5 (391 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Nissan | BMW |
Model | Cedric | X5 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |