1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Suzuki Jimny
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Jimny is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Suzuki Jimny (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Jimny should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 294 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Jimny.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Jimny. (106 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Jimny.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Suzuki Jimny | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cedric | Jimny |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1026 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2260 mm |
