1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,522 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (197 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | C70 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |
