1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2004 Toyota Avalon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Avalon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Avalon (211 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 361 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Avalon (298 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Avalon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Toyota Avalon | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | Avalon |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
