1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2006 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Cedric | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |