1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 305 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Cedric | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 166 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2400 mm |