1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (161 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | C70 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1658 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |