1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2008 Hyundai i20 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2008 Hyundai i20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 64 kg more than 2008 Hyundai i20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hyundai i20 (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Hyundai i20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Nissan | Hyundai |
Model | Cedric | i20 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1226 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2525 mm |