1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Cedric | 75 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |