1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2008 Toyota Aygo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Aygo (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Aygo should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 456 kg more than 2008 Toyota Aygo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Aygo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2340 mm |