1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Nissan | Citroen |
| Model | Cedric | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
