1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Proton Arena
To start off, 2009 Proton Arena is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Proton Arena (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Proton Arena should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 285 kg more than 2009 Proton Arena.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Proton Arena | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Cedric | Arena |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
