1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Cedric | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1870 mm |