1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. Both 1967 Nissan Cedric and 2010 Chevrolet Orlando are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Cedric | Orlando |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |