1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 401 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (510 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | Cedric | Ram |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 4080 mm |
