1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Cedric | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2685 mm |
