1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Rexton (183 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 695 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rexton (402 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2010 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
Model | Cedric | Rexton |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 402 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |