1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 124 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Cedric | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2436 mm |
