1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 230 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Cedric | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2788 mm |
