1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 393 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cedric | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2857 mm |
