1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 17 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Cedric | 3 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1303 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |
