1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1980 Volvo 260

To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80.

Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

1967 NSU Ro 80 1980 Volvo 260
Make NSU Volvo
Model Ro 80 260
Year Released 1967 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2390 cc 2383 cc
Horse Power 114 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 162 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1210 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2660 mm