1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2000 Holden Astra
To start off, 2000 Holden Astra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Astra (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 NSU Ro 80 | 2000 Holden Astra | |
| Make | NSU | Holden |
| Model | Ro 80 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1794 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |
