1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. 1967 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot Sesame has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot Sesame will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 NSU Ro 80 | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
| Make | NSU | Peugeot |
| Model | Ro 80 | Sesame |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1587 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
