1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2003 Honda Z

To start off, 2003 Honda Z is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2003 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Z. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Z.

Compare all specifications:

1967 NSU Ro 80 2003 Honda Z
Make NSU Honda
Model Ro 80 Z
Year Released 1967 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2390 cc 654 cc
Horse Power 114 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 162 Nm 61 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1210 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3410 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 L 35 L