1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 310 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1967 NSU Ro 80 | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
Make | NSU | Toyota |
Model | Ro 80 | Camry |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 3310 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |