1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2010 Kia Amanti
To start off, 2010 Kia Amanti is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Amanti is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Amanti (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Amanti should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Amanti (261 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Amanti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1967 NSU Ro 80 | 2010 Kia Amanti | |
Make | NSU | Kia |
Model | Ro 80 | Amanti |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 3778 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 261 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |