1967 Oldsmobile Toronado vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Oldsmobile Toronado | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Toronado | Falcon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6967 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.8 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 99.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |