1967 Opel Commodore vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1967 Opel Commodore. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Commodore.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Opel Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Commodore. (174 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Opel Commodore | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Opel | Holden |
| Model | Commodore | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3060 mm |
