1967 Opel Commodore vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 2,237 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Opel Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1967 Opel Commodore. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Commodore.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Opel Commodore (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Opel Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Opel Commodore | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Opel | Proton |
| Model | Commodore | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2237 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
