1967 Opel Record vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Omega (209 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 2003 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Opel Record | 2003 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Opel | Opel |
| Model | Record | Omega |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2511 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2740 mm |
