1967 Opel Record vs. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Because 1967 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Opel Record (152 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm). This means 1967 Opel Record will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Opel Record | 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Opel | Volkswagen |
Model | Record | Caddy |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2511 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |