1967 Opel Record vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Because 1967 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura CSX (188 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 2010 Acura CSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Opel Record | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Opel | Acura |
Model | Record | CSX |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2511 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |