1967 Opel Record vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Because 1967 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Cube (172 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Opel Record | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Record | Cube |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2511 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2530 mm |