1967 Pontiac GTO vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Honda CR-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 Pontiac GTO.
Because 1967 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Pontiac GTO | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Pontiac | Honda |
Model | GTO | CR-V |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |