1967 Reliant Rebel vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1967 Reliant Rebel is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1958 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Toyota Master RR (40 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Toyota Master RR should accelerate faster than 1967 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 689 kg more than 1967 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Reliant Rebel | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Reliant | Toyota |
| Model | Rebel | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 521 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2540 mm |
