1967 Reliant Rebel vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1967 Reliant Rebel.
Because 1967 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (51 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Reliant Rebel | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Reliant | Holden |
Model | Rebel | Cruze |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 748 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 51 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2685 mm |