1967 Renault 4 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 844 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | 4 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1494 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |