1967 Renault 4 vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (135 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 670 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | 4 | L |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 62 L |