1967 Renault 4 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 87 L |