1967 Renault 4 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 324 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | 4 | UTE |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 357 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |