1967 Renault 4 vs. 2009 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2009 Toyota Corolla is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Corolla (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 680 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2009 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |