1967 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (248 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1648 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Renault 4 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 4 | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 248 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 2298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 98 L |
