1967 Renault 8 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 490 kg more than 1967 Renault 8.
Because 1967 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 8 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 8 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1253 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1828 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2648 mm |