1967 Renault 8 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1967 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 635 kg more than 1967 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 8 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 8 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2648 mm |