1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 1986 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1986 Toyota Camry is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,974 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Camry (83 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Camry weights approximately 400 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Toyota Camry (157 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 1986 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | Kestrel | Camry |
Year Released | 1967 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1974 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2670 mm |