1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 1987 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1987 Suzuki Alto is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1987 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1987 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 285 kg more than 1987 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 1987 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Riley | Suzuki |
Model | Kestrel | Alto |
Year Released | 1967 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2180 mm |