1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 1999 Saturn SL
To start off, 1999 Saturn SL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Saturn SL (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Saturn SL should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Saturn SL weights approximately 167 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Saturn SL (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 1999 Saturn SL | |
Make | Riley | Saturn |
Model | Kestrel | SL |
Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |