1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2001 Kia Visto
To start off, 2001 Kia Visto is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 88 kg more than 2001 Kia Visto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Kia Visto. (74 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Kia Visto.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2001 Kia Visto | |
Make | Riley | Kia |
Model | Kestrel | Visto |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2390 mm |